Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Irony in Shakespeare’s poem on "My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun"


                                                                                                  By: Sarita Pantha
Irony is the simplest form which consists of saying one thing while meaning something opposite. I. A. Richards in his ‘Principles of Literary Criticism’ defined "Irony as equilibrium of opposing attitudes and evaluations" (32). Irony in this sense consists in the bringing on of the opposite, the complementary impulses; that is why poetry which is exposed to it is not of the highest order, and why irony itself is so constantly a characteristics of poetry. Irony may be dramatic, situational, or verbal. Dramatic irony occurs when a narrator or character perceives less than readers do. Situational irony occurs when what happens is at odds with what readers are led to expect; Verbal irony occurs when the narrator says one thing but actually means another.
"My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun" by William Shakespeare shows these different kinds of irony through different metaphor and similes. Metaphor and similes helps us to identify the exactness of the idea which is expressed by poet or author. That ideas deal with the very term irony. The poem starts with simple negation of resemblance situation where similarity is insisted upon as a custom. The poet misuses the metaphorical area a poetic language doing a false comparison. Irony can be defined as the balance between opposing attitudes. Such irony can be found clearly in sonnet 130 of Shakespeare. Shakespeare mainly uses the verbal irony in sonnet 130. Actually verbal irony means the poet or speaker of the poem says one thing but he or she actually means another meaning. For instance in the poem where his mistress eyes are comparing with the sun, Lips with coral, Breast with snow and blackness with wire hair. The false comparison showing the negative aspect of his mistress. The misuse of metaphorical dimension of poetical language done by the poet.
The poet also uses conditional stanza to compare his mistress with unmatchable things i.e. also called anti simile. That anti simile also creates the verbal irony.
If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun;
If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head. Shakespeare compares his mistress with natural thing and asks himself about her beauty. If we look the 3rd and 4th stanza from sonnet 130 we can’t help ourselves from laughing. The poet creates false comparisons which is unbelievable and ridiculous. All this comparison show gap between what the words seems to be saying and what they are saying so, the reader might get confusion. Note that verbal irony depends on knowledge of the fictional speakers ironic intention, which is shared both by the speaker and the reader; structural irony depends on a knowledge of the authors ironic intention, which is shared by the reader but is not intended by the fictional speaker.  An irony can add clue to sarcasm is the exaggerated inflection of the speaker's voice.
            Irony can be shown through different styles; including metaphor, simile and adjectives, etc. In this regards M. H. Abrams in his "A Glossary of Literary Terms" defines term "Irony as qualified by an adjective is used to identify various literary devices and modes of organization" (143). The sonnet My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun is also full of different adjectives which help to promote in the development of irony in the poem. For instance: red, white, pleasing, dun, black, etc. These adjective help us to know the better the metaphor and similes which is decorated in the poem and that decoration helps us to know the irony in the poem.
 He had seen different color of rose like red, white but he did not see roses in her cheeks it show the irony towards his mistress. And he compares her breath with bad smell not with the perfume which is more delight. Disparity contrast and disharmony are the major aspect of irony. It is thought that perhaps all words are not adequate for the representation of things. In the above lines the poet shows the negative aspect of his mistress.
            I love to hear her speak, yet well I know
            That music hath a far more pleasing sound;
            I grant I never saw a goddess go;
My mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground. The given lines show that beloved like to hear his mistress speak but the sound is not pleasing than the music and he never saw a goddess walk on the ground but he only saw his beloved walk in the ground. These four lines also show the verbal irony in the given stanza. Shakespeare shows the negative comparison it the given sonnet. 
In sonnet My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun the speaker of the poem puts the little ideas with big words through love, appearances, women and feminist, etc. The whole sonnet is a parody and parody also concerned with verbal irony because the author or poet uses those types of metaphor which is laughable by listening. The poet doesn’t even use the grandiose metaphor or allusion. The poem is mainly concerned with total and consuming of love.
Historically Shakespeare tells the beauty of his mistress among his friends through the help of irony connecting with the beauty of her but ironically. At the period of Shakespeare the entire all poet writes the poem describing their beloved through highly decorative metaphor but Shakespeare write the poem with the help of irony to be unique among them and always. The Shakespeare uses the dead metaphor as "My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun".
Walter Raleigh in his Printed book "Shakespeare” writes Keats knew the position well, and has commented on it, though not tragically in some passages of his letters. "Men of Genius," he says," are great as certain ethereal chemicals operating on the mass of neutral intellect- but they have not any individuality, any determined character. "And again "A poet is the most in poetical of anything in existence, because he has no identity – he is continually informing and filling some other body" (16).
In the sonnet My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun the poet may seem commendable, we must not forget that Shakespeare himself was the master of the compliment and frequently made use of the very same sorts of exaggerated comparisons in satirized way. In the poem the exaggeration of his mistress does not clearly portrait that person and won’t justify the actual amount of reality and that exaggeration may leads to confusion. Whether Shakespeare compare his love to dead metaphor and other false comparisons he conclude his poem with highly motivating his love by saying; "And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare As any she belied with false compare". The term yet shows the also irony in this poem that his rest of the stanzas are only for ironic propose but he thinks his love is greater than that false comparisons.
In conclusion Shakespeare as in his sonnet My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun uses irony to compare his love with unbelievable or ridiculous things. The first line of the poem shows the clear picture of verbal irony as "My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun".  Verbal irony occurs when the narrator says one thing but actually means another. Here the poet also says something but we understand another. The irony of the poem does not clearly portrait that person and won’t justify the actual amount of reality and that exaggeration may leads to confusion. Sonnet My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun is full of adjectives which help us to know the better about the metaphor and similes which is decorated in the poem and that decoration helps us to know the irony in the poem. Irony is the simplest form which consists of saying one thing while meaning something opposite as equilibrium of opposing attitudes and evaluations. Irony in this sense consists in the bringing on of the opposite, the complementary impulses; that is why poetry which is exposed to it is not of the highest order, and why irony itself is so constantly a characteristics of poetry which is.  So My Mistress Eyes are Nothing Like the Sun by William Shakespeare shows these different kinds of irony through different metaphor and similes. The poem starts and ends with simple negation of resemblance situation where similarity is insisted upon as a custom.
                                                         
     Work sited
Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Eighth Edition, 2005. (142-143).
Ferguson, Margaret. Salter, Jo Mary. Stallworthy, Jon. The Norton Anthology  of
               Poetry. Fifth Edition. 2005. (1)
Raleigh, Walter. Shakeapeare. INC, New York. 1953, 1957. (16).
Richards, I. A. Principles of Literary Criticism.London: Rotuludge ,1924. (32).





Research Paper Writing


                                           By: Salina Pun

            The research paper is an excellent tool. It is a mini-classroom intended solely for your benefit. It is an intense learning process focused on a topic you choose. Of course, it is possible that the instructor will assign a specific topic, but typically topic choice is left up to the writer and is even sometimes regarded as a test of the writer’s judgment. The student who chooses a vast topic, such as wars throughout the ages, has taken on too big a job. On the other hand, the student who chooses to write on the history of the tire iron is proposing a topic that is too small. Writing a research paper also has practical effects that could help you in later life.
            Research comes from the Middle French word rechercher, meaning “to seek out.” Writing a research paper requires you to seek out information about a subject, take a stand on it, and back it up with the opinions, ideas, and views of others. What results is a printed paper variously known as a term paper or library paper, usually between five and fifteen pages long—most instructors specify a minimum length—in which you present your views and findings on the chosen subject.
            One obvious reason for the research paper is that writing it forces you to learn lots about your chosen subject. Sifting through the pros and cons of opinions on any subject is a priceless learning experience. Another reason is that writing the paper teaches you the conventions of scholarly writing, among them the accepted styles of documentation and the ethics of research.
1d Anthony in his book Writing the Research Paper says:
You will become familiar with the library through the “learning by doing” method. Even the simplest library is an intricate storehouse of information, bristling with indexes, encyclopaedias, and abstracts. How to seek out from this maze of sources a single piece of information is a skill you learn by actual doing. Writing a research paper may also mean interviewing experts about your subject and blending their ideas with your own distinct point of view. (5)
 In short, you, like everyone else, can profit from knowing how to do research. There are other benefits as well. Writing the research paper is an exercise in logic, imagination, and common sense. As you chip away at the mass of data and information available on your chosen topic, you learn How to track down information, how to organize, how to use the Internet in your research, how to discriminate between useless and useful opinions, how to summarize, how to budget your time, how to conceive of and manage a research project from start to finish. Papers assigned in colleges are one of two kinds: the report paper or the thesis paper. The report paper summarizes and reports your findings on a particular subject. You neither judge nor evaluate the findings; you simply relate them in a logical sequence. For instance, a paper that describes the opinions of experts in the debate over global warming is a report paper. Likewise a paper that chronologically narrates the final days of Hitler is a report paper.
            Probably no single step is as important to the whole process of writing a research paper as the choice of a topic. You’re like a traveller who is choosing where to go. If it’s someplace you like, you’ll enjoy getting there. If it turns out to be a place you don’t like, getting there will make you miserable. Ideally you should choose a topic that interests you, that is complex enough to need several research sources, and that will not bore—or talk down to—your reader.
            Research paper writing is an academic work. It requires the skills of organizing data, using classification and displays identifying and implementing key aspects of academic text structures and using the internet materials properly. Classification is an important element in academic writing because it can be applied from intermediate to very advanced levels. Classification is a central concern of many disciplines in the hard natural sciences, and in social sciences including language studies as well.
Hira Lal Subedi in his book Academic Writing says:
Research papers needs exploring the internet and other resources. The internet is completely useful for writing an academic text because it lets the writer enter into a virtual community in which all kinds of information and help are available. We need to navigate the internet in order to discover the information we intend to find. When we use the internet information, we need to give credit to the electronic resources in in-text citations and references. In order to write an academic text we need to use the printed resources along with the internet. We should not forget that libraries are still wonderful resources. We can make use of traditional as well as e-libraries which we feel easy to use and rich in the information we need. (69)
            Life would be simpler for the researcher if there were one universal format applicable to all disciplines. Unfortunately, there isn’t. Every research paper must therefore conform to a specific format, like the one invented by the Modern Language
Association (MLA), a society of language scholars; or the American Psychological Association (APA), a society of scientific scholars; or the Chicago Manual of Style
(CMS), created by a board of editors. The format governs the entire paper, from the placement of the title, to the width of the margins, to the notation used in acknowledging material from other sources. This sort of standardization makes it easier to write a scholarly paper as well as to read one. Part of your baptism of scholarship is to become familiar with the major citation styles used by different disciplines—most of which are covered in this book. Your instructor no doubt will tell you what documentation style to use. Once you know that, you can concentrate on mastering that style and ignore the others.
            In conclusion, writing research paper needs good determination and attention toward subject matter. Everybody can’t get involved in this job. Every research paper must therefore conform to a specific format. Research papers needs exploring the internet which is completely useful for writing an academic text because it lets the writer enter into a virtual community in which all kinds of information and help are available. When we use the internet information, we need to give credit to the electronic resources in in-text citations and references. Research paper writing is an academic work. Organizing data, using classification and displays identifying and implementing key aspects of academic text structures and using the internet materials should be used properly. Research paper requires good information about a subject, take a stand on it, and back it up with the opinions, ideas, and views of others to support the main ideas of the paper.

     Works Cited
Kumar, R. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Delhi: Pearson
            Education. 2006.
Subedi, H. L. Academic Writing. Kathmandu: Pradhan Book House. 2012.
Winkler, Anthony. C. Writing the Research Paper. Boston: Wadsworth. 2008.


Confessional poetry


Confessional poetry is the poetry of the personal or “I.” This style of writing emerged in the late 1950s and early 1960s and is associated with poets such as Robert Lowell, Sylvia Plath, Anne Sexton, and W.D. Snodgrass. Lowell’s book Life Studies was a highly personal account of his life and familial ties, and had a significant impact on American poetry. Plath and Sexton were both students of Lowell and noted that his work influenced their own writing.
            The confessional poetry of the mid-twentieth century dealt with subject matter that previously had not been openly discussed in American poetry. Private experiences with and feelings about death, trauma, depression and relationships were addressed in this type of poetry, often in an autobiographical manner. Sexton in particular was interested in the psychological aspect of poetry, having started writing at the suggestion of her therapist.
            The confessional poets were not merely recording their emotions on paper; craft and construction were extremely important to their work. While their treatment of the poetic self may have been groundbreaking and shocking to some readers, these poets maintained a high level of craftsmanship through their careful attention to and use of prosody.
            One of the most well-known poems by a confessional poet is “Daddy” by Sylvia Plath. Addressed to her father, the poem contains references to the Holocaust but uses a sing-song rhythm that echoes the nursery rhymes of childhood:
Daddy, I have had to kill you.
You died before I had time--
Marble-heavy, a bag full of God,
Ghastly statue with one gray toe
Big as a Frisco seal
            Another confessional poet of this generation was John Berryman. His major work was The Dream Songs, which consists of 385 poems about a character named Henry and his friend Mr. Bones. Many of the poems contain elements of Berryman’s own life and traumas, such as his father’s suicide. Below is an excerpt from “Dream Song 1”:
All the world like a woolen lover
once did seem on Henry’s side.
Then came a departure.
Thereafter nothing fell out as it might or ought.
I don’t see how Henry, pried
open for all the world to see, survived.
            The confessional poets of the 1950s and 1960s pioneered a type of writing that forever changed the landscape of American poetry. The tradition of confessional poetry has been a major influence on generations of writers and continues to this day; Marie Howe and Sharon Olds are two contemporary poets whose writing largely draws upon their personal experience.
Confessional poetry
            Confessional poetry or 'Confessionalism' is a style of poetry that emerged in the United States during the 1950s. It has been described as poetry "of the personal," focusing on extreme moments of individual experience, the psyche, and personal trauma, including previously taboo matter such as mental illness, sexuality, and suicide, often set in relation to broader social themes.[1] It is sometimes also classified as Postmodernism.[2]
            The school of "Confessional Poetry" was associated with several poets who redefined American poetry in the '50s and '60s, including Robert Lowell, Sylvia Plath, John Berryman, Anne Sexton, Allen Ginsberg, and W. D. Snodgrass.[3][4]
Contents
·         2 Further developments
·         3 Reaction
·         4 See also
·         5 Notes
·         6 References


Life Studies and the emergence of Confessionalism
            In 1959 M. L. Rosenthal first used the term "confessional" in a review of Robert Lowell's Life Studies entitled "Poetry as Confession",[5] Rosenthal differentiated the confessional approach from other modes of lyric poetry by way of its use of confidences that (Rosenthal said) went “beyond customary bounds of reticence or personal embarrassment”.[6] Rosenthal notes that in earlier tendencies towards the confessional there was typically a "mask" that hid the poet's "actual face", and states that “Lowell removes the mask. His speaker is unequivocally himself, and it is hard not to think of Life Studies as a series of personal confidences, rather shameful, that one is honor-bound not to reveal”.[7] In a review of the book in The Kenyon Review, John Thompson wrote, "For these poems, the question of propriety no longer exists. They have made a conquest: what they have won is a major expansion of the territory of poetry."[8]
            There were however clear moves towards the "confessional" mode before the publication of Life Studies. Delmore Schwartz's confessional long poem Genesis had been published in 1943; and John Berryman had written a sonnet sequence in 1947 about an adulterous affair he'd had with a woman named Chris while he was married to his first wife, Eileen (however, since publishing the sonnets would have revealed the affair to his wife, Berryman didn't actually publish the sequence, titled Berryman's Sonnets, until 1967, after he divorced from his first wife).[9][10] Snodgrass' Heart's Needle, in which he writes about the aftermath of his divorce, also preceded Life Studies.
            Life Studies was nonetheless the first book in the confessional mode that captured the reading public's attention and the first to officially be labeled "confessional." Most notably "confessional" were the poems in the final section of Life Studies in which Lowell alludes to his struggles with mental illness and his experiences in a mental hospital. Plath remarked upon the influence of these types of poems from Life Studies in an interview in which she stated, "I've been very excited by what I feel is the new breakthrough that came with, say, Robert Lowell's Life Studies, this intense breakthrough into very serious, very personal, emotional experience which I feel has been partly taboo. Robert Lowell's poems about his experience in a mental hospital, for example, interested me very much."[11] A. Alvarez however considered that some poems in Life Studies seemed “more compulsively concerned with the processes of psychoanalysis than with those of poetry”;[12] while conversely Michael Hofmann saw the verbal merit of Lowell's work only diminished by emphasis on “what I would call the C-word, 'Confessionalism'”.[13]
Further developments
Other key texts of the American "confessional" school of poetry include Plath's Ariel, Berryman's The Dream Songs, and Sexton's To Bedlam and Part Way Back.
Another significant, if transitional figure was Adrienne Rich;[14] while one of the most prominent, consciously "confessional" poets to emerge in the 1980s was Sharon Olds whose focus on taboo sexual subject matter built off of the work of Ginsberg.
Reaction
In the 1970s and 1980s, some writers rebelled against Confessionalism in American poetry, arguing that it was too self-indulgent. For instance, one of the foremost poets of the Deep Image school, Robert Bly, was highly critical of what he perceived to be the solipsistic tendencies of Confessional poets. He referenced this aesthetic distaste when he praised the poet Antonio Machado for "his emphasis on the suffering of others rather than his own".[15] However, many others writers during this period, like Sharon Olds, Marie Howe, and Franz Wright, were strongly influenced by the precedent set by Confessional poetry with its themes of taboo autobiographical experience, of the psyche and the self, and revelations of childhood and adult traumas.
The poetic movement of New Formalism, a return to rhyme and meter, would also spring from a backlash against free verse that had become popular in Confessional poetry. Another poetry movement that formed, in part, as a reaction to confessional poetry included the Language poets.
Confessional Poetry
            Though her work in many ways confounds the designation, Sylvia Plath can be better appreciated when one understands the genre of confessional poetry, in which she is often grouped.
            Confessional poetry is a genre of poetry first identified in the decades immediately following the Second World War. It was initiated with the publication of Robert Lowell's Life Studies (1959); other poets whose work typifies this style include Sylvia Plath, Theodore Roethke, and Anne Sexton. With its origins in the British romantic poets of the 19th century, such as Wordsworth and Coleridge, confessional poetry of the modern era focused on inward expressions of conflict and emotion through the use extremely personal details from the poet's life. Critics sometimes include the Beat poets, particularly Allen Ginsberg, in this movement.
Confessional poetry was a reaction to the depersonalized, academic poetry of writers like T.S. Eliot and W.H. Auden, who wrote in the 1920s and 1930s. These paragons of modernism believed poetry was a thing apart from its creator, and that there was no room for the self in poetry. The confessional poets did not adhere to this perspective, instead writing from a deeply personal perspective and filling their work with intimate and controversial details from their private lives.
Robert Lowell, the veritable founding father of the movement, was a professor at Boston University, where he taught poetry workshops that Sexton and Plath attended. Life Studies dealt with many of Lowell's family dysfunctions, alcoholism, and sexual guilt, thereby breaking with previous poetic tradition and veering more toward the freer forms of William Carlos Williams. M.L. Rosenthal first used the term "confessional poetry" when writing a review about Lowell's work.
Anne Sexton wrote poetry that dealt with her personal life, including her experiences with psychotherapy, sex, depression, and rage. One of her most significant works, To Bedlam and Part Way Back (1960), dealt with such excruciating topics as molestation by a father.
Sylvia Plath is commonly seen as a confessional poet, although some critics dispute her placement within this movement, arguing that her work is more universal than commonly assumed. Nevertheless, Ariel, published posthumously in 1965, deals with the very personal issues of suicide, sex, her children, and, most dramatically, her complicated relationship with her deceased father. Poems like "Daddy," "Ariel," and "Lady Lazarus" are stunning in their originality, wit, and brutality.
            The confessional poets have garnered a lot of critical interest, but there is a tendency to conflate their art and lives too fully - the usage of a personal pronoun in their work is not an unequivocal invitation to assume that the subject of the poem is always the poet. Critic Mary A. Murphy writes about the poets that "their poems are not open wounds on the page. Their work is a crafted response to their overwhelming emotional impulses. They use the sharply defined sensory prompts and the everyday language of the common person learned from the imagist school. The profound intimacy of the poetry demands such an accessibility." While the tales of personal tragedies might be the most fascinating aspect of their work for many readers, the confessional poets were also masters of their craft. Plath is well understood as a reflection of both sides of the debate.
Major Themes
Death
Death is an ever-present reality in Plath's poetry, and manifests in several different ways.
            One common theme is the void left by her father's death. In "Full Fathom Five," she speaks of his death and burial, mourning that she is forever exiled. In "The Colossus," she tries in vain to put him back together again and make him speak. In "Daddy," she goes further in claiming that she wants to kill him herself, finally exorcising his vicious hold over her mind and her work.
            Death is also dealt with in terms of suicide, which eerily corresponds to her own suicide attempts and eventual death by suicide. In "Lady Lazarus," she claims that she has mastered the art of dying after trying to kill herself multiple times. She sneers that everyone is used to crowding in and watching her self-destruct. Suicide, though, is presented as a desirable alternative in many of these works. The poems suggest it would release her from the difficulties of life, and bring her transcendence wherein her mind could free itself from its corporeal cage. This desire is exhilaratingly expressed in "Ariel," and bleakly and resignedly expressed in "Edge." Death is an immensely vivid aspect of Plath's work, both in metaphorical and literal representations.
Victimization
            Plath felt like a victim to the men in her life, including her father, her husband, and the great male-dominated literary world. Her poetry can often be understood as response to these feelings of victimization, and many of the poems with a male figure can be interpreted as referring to any or all of these male forces in her life.
            In regards to her father, she realized she could never escape his terrible hold over her; she expressed her sense of victimhood in "The Colossus" and "Daddy," using powerful metaphors and comparisons to limn a man who figured heavily in her psyche.
            Her husband also victimized her through the power he exerted as a man, both by assuming he should have the literary career and through his infidelity. Plath felt relegated to a subordinate, "feminine" position which stripped from her any autonomy or power. Her poems from the "Colossus" era express her frustration over the strictures under which she operated. For instance, "A Life" evokes a menacing and bleak future for Plath. However, in her later poems, she seems finally able to transcend her status as victim by fully embracing her creative gifts ("Ariel"), metaphorically killing her father ("Daddy"), and committing suicide ("Lady Lazarus", "Edge").
Patriarchy
            Plath lived and worked in 1950s/1960s England and America, societies characterized by very strict gender norms. Women were expected to remain safely ensconced in the house, with motherhood as their ultimate joy and goal. Women who ventured into the arts found it difficult to attain much attention for their work, and were often subject to marginalization and disdain. Plath explored and challenged this reductionist tendency through her work, offering poems of intense vitality and stunning language. She depicted the bleakness of the domestic scene, the disappointment of pregnancy, the despair over her husband's infidelity, her tortured relationship with her father, and her attempts to find her own creative voice amidst the crushing weight of patriarchy. She shied away from using genteel language and avoided writing only of traditionally "female" topics. Most impressively, the work remains poetic and artistic - rather than political - because of her willing to admit ambivalence over all these expectations, admitting that both perspectives can prove a trap.
Nature
            Images and allusions to nature permeate Plath's poetry. She often evokes the sea and the fields to great effect. The sea is usually associated with her father; it is powerful, unpredictable, mesmerizing, and dangerous. In "Full Fathom Five," her father is depicted as a sea god. An image of the sea is also used in "Contusion," there suggesting a terrible sense of loss and loneliness.
            She also pulled from her personal life, writing of horse-riding on the English fields, in "Sheep in Fog" and "Ariel." In these cases, she uses the activity to suggest an otherworldly, mystical arena in which creative thought or unfettered emotion can be expressed.
            Nature is also manifested in the bright red tulips which jolt the listless Plath from her post-operation stupor, insisting that she return to the world of the living. Here, nature is a provoker, an instigator - it does not want her to give up. Nature is a ubiquitous theme in Plath's work; it is a potent force that is sometimes unpredictable, but usually works to encourage her creative output.
The self
            Plath has often been grouped into the confessional movement of poetry. One of the reasons for this classification is that she wrote extensively of her own life, her own thoughts, her own worries. Any great artist both creates his or her art and is created by it, and Plath was always endeavoring to know herself better through her writing. She tried to come to terms with her personal demons, and tried to work through her problematic relationships. For instance, she tried to understand her ambivalence about motherhood, and tried to vent her rage at her failed marriage.
            However, her exploration of herself can also be understood as an exploration of the idea of the self, as it stands opposed to society as a whole and to other people, whom she did not particularly like. Joyce Carol Oates wrote that even Plath's children seemed to be merely the objects of her perception, rather than subjective extensions of herself. The specifics of Plath's work were drawn from her life, but endeavored to transcend those to ask more universal questions. Most infamously, Plath imagined her self as a Jew, another wounded and persecuted victim. She also tried to engage with the idea of self in terms of the mind and body dialectic. "Edge" and "Sheep in Fog" explore her desire to leave the earthly life, but express some ambivalence about what is to come after. "Ariel" suggests it is glory and oneness with nature, but the other two poems do not seem to know what will happen to the mind/soul once the body is eradicated. This conflict - between the self and the world outside - can be used to understand almost all of Plath's poems.
The Body
Many of Plath's poems deal with the body, in terms of motherhood, wounds, operations, and death.
            In "Metaphors," she describes how her body does not feel like it is her own; she is simply a "means" towards delivering a child. In "Tulips" and "A Life," the body has undergone an operation. With the surgery comes an excising of emotion, attachment, connection, and responsibility. The physical cut has resulted in an emotional severing, which is a relief to the depressed woman. "Cut" depicts the thrill Plath feels on almost cutting her own thumb off. It is suggested that she feels more alive as she contemplates her nearly-decapitated thumb, and watches the blood pool on the floor. "Contusion" takes things further - she has received a bruise for some reason, but unlike in "Cut," where she eventually seems to grow uneasy with the wound, she seems to welcome the physical pain, since the bruise suggests an imminent end to her suffering. Suicide, the most profound and dramatic thing one can do to one's own body, is also central to many of her poems.
            Overall, it is clear that Plath was constantly discerning the relationship between mind and body, and was fascinated with the implications of bodily pain.
Motherhood
            Motherhood is a major theme in Plath's work. She was profoundly ambivalent about this prescribed role for women, writing in "Metaphors" about how she felt insignificant as a pregnant woman, a mere "means" to an end. She lamented how grotesque she looked, and expressed her resignation over a perceived lack of options. However, in "Child," she delights in her child's perception of and engagement with the world. Of course, "Child" ends with the suggestions that she knows her child will someday see the harsh reality of life. Plath did not want her children to be contaminated by her own despair. This fear may also have manifested itself in her last poem, "Edge," in which some critics have discerned a desire to kill her children and take them with her far from the terrors of life. Other poems in her oeuvre express the same tension. Overall, Plath clearly loved her children, but was not completely content in either pregnancy or motherhood.


Revisiting the Past: A New Historical Reading of Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities

                                                   By: Manoj Sapkota

    Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities (1859) is a historical novel set in London and Paris before and during the French Revolution. The novel depicts the pathetic condition of French peasantry and the brutality demonstrated by the revolutionaries towards the former aristocrats in the initial years of revolution. As it is a historical novel, though the characters are fictitious, it reveals the injustices, oppressions and the social problems of the then French society in addition to the violent appearance of revolution with excess of bloodshed. This paper explores the pitiful and wretched condition of former aristocrats caused by the barbarous nature of revolutionaries so as to take personal revenge in the name of politics, the plight of French peasantry demoralized by the aristocrats and the role of women in the revolution and its later depiction in French and the world literature.
    The novel revolves around the French Revolution and the tension in England. Here, Dickens gives the tale of a family handling the extreme difficulty and obscurity in the conflict between aristocracy and the revolutionaries. His voice varies from being sympathetic with the revolutionaries due to their method of revolting. So, his neutrality though sometimes wavering from side to side, can be found apparent through the whole novel.
    The historians have acknowledged that the French Revolution was one of the greatest revolutions of the west. Much has been said and discussed about the origins and the structure of the revolution, from the incompetency of Louis XVI, ignorance of the aristocracy and the hardship of French people’s life but much less had been said about the brutality of the revolutionaries and the role of women in the revolution and its later portrayal in the native as well as world literature.
    New Historicism is a critical theory which aims to understand the work through its cultural context and to understand intellectual history through literature. As a critical approach to literature, it rejects the autonomy of text as well as the autonomy of the author rather it views the literary texts as only fore-grounded form of politico-cultural, social and economic background. So, it is inseparable from the historical background and the author is also in the grip of historical circumstances of the period of text. Thus history is an embedded element to literature and vice versa since literature is not simply the consequence of history rather it makes use of history through its participation in discursive practices. In this regard, Luis Montrose asserts:
The new(er) historical criticism could to be new in refusing unexamined distinction between ‘literature’ and ‘history’, between 'text' and 'context' is resisting a tendency to posit and privilege an autonomous individual whether an author or a work to be set against a social or literary background. To emphasize this view of Montrose, M.A.R. Habib says, “The new historicism argues that analysis of literary texts could not be restricted to texts themselves or to their author's psychology and background, rather the larger contexts and cultural conventions in which texts were produces needed to be considered.” (398/766)
So, the literary texts cannot provoke the crystal clear reality as they are influenced by psychological state of the author, her perception as well as the reaction towards the circumstances. And new historicism is such a literary theory based on the idea that literary texts should be studied and interpreted within the context of both the history of the author and the history of the critic. Thus the new historicism looks at the literature in a wider historical context, examining both how the writer's times affected the work and how the work reflects the writer's times.
    The novel reveals the oppressions done from the aristocrat's side. Marquis Evremonde, the representative of aristocrats, drives his carriage over an innocent child of peasant and shows the inhuman characteristics. Evremonde, a man of about sixty, handsomely dressed, naughty in manner is a sociopath who sees cruelty as entertainment. He despises his own class but he can only unleash his hatred on those who cannot fight back like the farmer over whose son he drives the carriage. We find him crashing through the streets in his carriage, whipping his horses to froth and terrifying pedestrians. “It's extraordinary to me” (157), he tells the crowd that gathers at the scene  “that you people cannot take care of yourselves and your children. One or the other of you is for ever in the way. How do I know what injury you have done my horses” (157)? This is the good example to show that Evremonde was a cruel ruler to enjoy at the trouble of others. After killing the child, he takes out a golden coin and throws to the crowd in compensation to the loss. It clarifies his attitude to objectify the peasants. Thus this novel written with sorrow and concern exposes the inhumanity of aristocrats. It shows sympathy for the miserable life of the oppressed and expresses extraordinary ideas about the mass revolution through the ambivalent attitude of the writer.
    But in the next hand, in the novel, writer shows us a revolution where no one is right; no one is even being rational. Revolutionaries like Madame Defarge are killing innocent people to get revenge. But it is not given the more significance in the novel. The first characters to show very irrational and inhuman actions are the revolutionaries during the French Revolution. The cash broken in the streets of poverty striven down where the people were poor and looking for the way to end their suffering. The people rushed to the wine and began scooping it up with their hands. These ravenous actions are no humane and civilized.
    As the aristocrats, the revolutionaries in the novel also hold many depositions. Charles Darnay who has already got detached from his uncle Marquis Evremonde seems to have a noble soul but he comes from the corrupted roots. He had a type of tussle with his uncle Evremonde who attempted to put him in prison. So, Darnay rejects the family name as shameful and rejects to assume his place as heir and prefers his penniless English life. But later on, though he was innocent and hadn't done any crime to the revolutionaries, due to being from the aristocratic background, he is imprisoned and told that he would be sentenced to death. It is not a justifiable action done by the revolutionaries. So in addition to the cruelty of the aristocrats, the revolutionaries also possess a type of inhumane and brutal attitude.
    Due to being associated with Darnay, Lucie and her father, Dr. Mannete are also at the centre and closely observed by Madame Defarge to take the revenge with Darnay. They, including Darnay leave that place to save their lives. Because Syndey Carton becomes unable to win the heart of woman he loves, Lucie Mannete, he redeems himself giving up his own life so that Lucie's husband, Darnay might live. Thus, for the death of Carton too, the cruel role of the revolutionaries is responsible.
    In the novel, Dickens traces the private lives of people caught in the cataclysm of the revolution. But the readers are unable to bear its clear picture in their mind. The whole action revolves around the Paris and London women. Those women provide the moral climate of the group or family throughout the whole narratives. In The Tale of Two Cities the emotional foundation has been provided to men by those women and that causes the man to act for or react against what the women represent.
    Lucie Mannete and Madame Defarge are the two characters who ultimately put the Revolutionary France and England against each other. Lucie doesn't have the active role but she is highly influential. She influences others through who she is but not through what she does. Lucie created the comfortable home which provides the men with comfort in her life and her compassion for others really inspires them. They are able to uplift their status and they find the strength to escape the prison of their lives due to her goodness. She demonstrates the faith in the overriding power of gender as natural determinant of female identity. Her appeal to the sanctity of the middle class family and to the women's status as relative creatures within it can be found. In the novel, the writer presents her as a compassionate and virtuous woman who inspires affection in the other characters. Though she doesn't seem to be an important character in the poem, it is actually important her role. Because of her unconditional love and compassion, Lucie is used to demonstrate how strong their characters really are in the violent situation too.
    In another side, though Madame Defarhge is sitting in her small wine shop knitting the death register, she is the acting leader of the revolutionary act in France. Regarding it, Bloom says, “Dickens provides us with the lady Macketh in Madame Defarge, the fiercely attractive genius of the French Revolution” (n. pag.). So, Defarge initiates the violence. She is childless and merciless. Although she is the antithesis of Lucie Mannete, they both possess the common ability that is to inspire others. She is the antithesis of Lucie in this sense that Lucie is creative and nurturing to life where as Defarge is destructive. Because Defarge was perished by her family in her early age, she seeks the revenge not only in her family but in the whole class. She knits a register of the oppressors which represents her patience and urge and she wants to doom them to destruction. Her knitting is a history which records the past in a mysterious manner. The register which she knits produces a shock in its implicit linkage of images and emotions. The creativity and maternal affection including nurture are linked with violence and death. The line “A rose lay beside her, and if she now and then glanced at the flower , it was with no infraction of her usual preoccupied air (249)” is the related example that the rose Fefarge pins in her head-dress  as threatening sign to her fellows. It is important in another way also that the aesthetics of feminine ornament are organized in the service of revolution. Hence, as Defarge's handwork promotes violence and destruction, she is an important acting leader of French Revolution.
    In parallel and contrast, Madame Defarge is described as a ‘tigress’ and absolutely without pity. Here Waters asserts, “As the careful juxtapositioning of Madame Defarge with Lucie Mannete in the novel shows, the universal human nature which Dickens is attempting to portray through these techniques of parallelism takes gender as the trans-historical constituent of identity and yet at the same time grounds it in the ideology of the Victorian middle class family” (139).  So for the definition of female identity produced through the opposition between these women, Defarge and Lusie Mannete, hinges upon the expanded formation of domestic ideology as well as the propagation of values of home in Victorian middle-class culture.
    In the name of politics, the revolutionists take the revenge with the aristocrats. Whatever they do, that is only to take the revenge of the suffering, embarrassment and agony they got from the aristocrats in the past. They have just disguised them in the form of the politicians and carry out the brutal acts against the former leading class. Their reaction is no less brutal and atrocious than the actions of upper class people. So, they have used the masks of politicians and to knit the conspiracy so as to imprison the former aristocrats.
    To sum up, Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities depicts the disguised form of the revolutionists taking revenge in brutal manner in the name of politics. We find female hinged upon the enlarged arrangement of domestic ideology. Defarge, a cruel and merciless woman who encourages devastation is a leading person of French Revolution. Though much remarkable role cannot be seen, Lucie is a weighty character around whom most of the actions of the novel move around. The role of the revolutionists is humane and brutal which takes the life of aristocrats as well as of former aristocrats and innocent people too. The images of the plight of revolution are demoralized by the aristocracy and the images of the predicament of aristocrats as well as former aristocrats caused by the uncultured traits of revolutionaries are significant in the novel.


                                                            Works Cited:
    Bloom, Harold. ed. “Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities Bloom’s Notes”.             Broomall: Chelsea House Publishers, 1996.
    Dickens, Charles. A Tale of Two Cities. London: GRW Publishing Limited, 2003.
    Greenblatt, Stephen. “Renaissance Self- Fashioning: Form More to Shakespeare”.             Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
    Montrose, Louis Adrin. “New Historicisms”. Redrawing the Boundaries: the     Transformation of English and American Literary Studies.  Ed. Stephen     Greenblatt and G. Gunn.  New York: MLA Press, 1992. 392-418.
    Waters, Catherine. Dickens and the Politics of the Family. Cambridge: Cambridge,         2000. 139.
   

Contemporary Patriarchal Society in Bronte’s Wuthering Heights


                                                                              By: Sarita Pantha
Bronte’s Wuthering Heights wanted to tackle the issue of female problem through the mouth piece of Catherine and this novel considered to the age of Victorian period and in this period the rise of the novel as a genre is closely linked to the rise of women as writers of novels. The form and conventions of novel writing were largely shaped by these women writers and the socioeconomic conditions they were negotiating.
Wuthering Heights mainly focuses on the racial discrimination and problem of contemporary society through the eyes of two different narrator Nelly Dean itself a female and Lockwood as well. Victorian period had due respect toward male oriented society and family relations. It does have the quite good effect of patriarchal society. M. H. Abrams in his A Glossary Of Literary Terms says:
Patriarchal is the basic view of western civilization- that is it is male-centred and controlled is organized and conducted in such a way as to subordinate women to men in all cultural domains: familial, religious, political, economic, social, legal and artistic. (94)
            The novel considered with the Victorian period, in Victorian period, women were treated as inferior human beings. Such a belief was so deep rooted in the Victorian society that even doctors and physicians believed that women’s physically affected their mentality. According to them, women’s physiological function was very complicated. Because of this complication twenty percent their creative power is diverted from brain activity. In other words women in Victorian era were supported to have twenty percent less mental creativity then man had.
Wuthering Heights is very imagery novel, while reading novel we can see vivid images of that so called male society who dominated female. Heathcliff as a man protagonist of the novel, encounter with different situation some where with revenge, love and harted. Heathcliff was adapted by Mr .Earnshaw is the early age of his life at Liverpool and take both lodging and fooding at one roof of Earnshaw family but Earnshawn’s son Hindley detest him. Earnshaw had two children named Hindley and Catherine. Catherine at first hate Heathcliff but after few months she is in love with him but Catherine does not accept him as her husband. The whole story walks with Catherine and Heathcliff past event told through the voice of Nelly Dean.
            On the surface, the novel is the history of two families which crisscross in many complex ways over three generations. What makes the novel unique however is that along with being a chronological narrative, it becomes a story of elemental forces at work. This is primarily achieved by the narrative technique, the delineation of character and the language used .Virginia Woolf, writing in the first part of the twentieth century, describes the novel thus Wuthering Heights is not about the love of men and women. Emily was inspired by some moral general conception ….  The impulse which urged her to create was not her own suffering in or her own injuries .She looked out upon a world cleft in to gigantic disorder and felt with in her power to unite it in a book. It is this suggestion of power underlying…. That gives the book its huge stature among other novels.
            In the patriarchal society women ought to speak as permitted by male. According to patriarchal thought, Society is supposed to be created by male than selves. In the novel Wuthering Heights also female’s attitude toward society was shaped by so called male society. In the both families Catherine and Isabella were victimized by male. Women are always suppressed by the male counterparts. They even deprived of power so in Wuthering Heights Catherine’s longing for power can be seen in different scenes. Firstly when Mr. Earnshaw asked her what he would bring her when he returned from Liverpool… “What shall I bring you? You may choose what you like what you like. Only let it be little, for I shall walk there and back, sixty miles each way, that is a long spell!” Hindley named a fiddle and then he asked Miss Cathy; she was hardly six years old, but se could ride any horse in he stable and choose a whip” (Chap. 14).
            Catherine was not sure who she actually was. Calling herself as a pet, Catherine expressed her wish to escape from domestic encloser. Later in her madness she tore the pillow with her teeth. Tearing the pillow and letting the feathers go free seem to be very meaningful. Being a girl belonging to farming culture Catherine always wants to have a better life. That’s why she married Edgar Linton instead of Heathcliff. Catherine rejected Heathcliff as a husband because he was socially and economically inferior to Linton.
            In Victorian period, women have to follow the rules, values and institutions that were established to favour men. But right from her childhood Catherine challenges all these values, institutions and even relationships. Catherine tries to lead two lives. She hopes to require authenticity with social conventions, running in harness an anthological commitment to Heathcliff with a phenomenal relationship to Linton. She says ‘I am Heathcliff but rejects him and marries Linton. To lead a two life was surely a great challenge to the values, the values set by the male society.
            Marriage is one of the most important social rite and rituals till date. Before deciding to marry someone one should take the suggestions from guardians in the Victorian era. However Catherine goes to opposite of the old tradition and decides to marry Edgar on her own. But she is not sure whether she made a good decision or not. So she asked Nelly Dean whether her choice was right or wrong. As we can she in chapter 9 as “Today, Edgar Linton asked me to marry him, and I have given him an answer.---” I accepted him , Nelly. Be quick, and say whether I was wrong!”
            Wuthering Heights is fully of imageries from which we can see the clear picture of contemporary male dominated society where female can not get rights of education, health, marriage etc. They should think about their family and children. In the novel female are victimized in the case of love, marriage, revenge and detest. There is no doubt that Heathcliff loves Catherine but the passionate love brings massive destruction in the novel. Catherine died after giving the birth of younger Catherine and Frances also died after giving birth of Hereton. From this we can conclude that in Victorian Era a woman are treated as the machine to produce the baby but does not care about their health condition.
            In the names of revenge Heathcliff also treat a bad behaviour toward Isabella and she escape from these torture and does not come back to Heathcliff. After the death of both father and mother of young Catherine, Heathcliff keep her in his home and treated badly. Heathcliff’s mind was full of revenge for Edgar and Isabella because in the early age of his childhood they treated them as slaves. They ignore and does not give permission even enter in their house.
            In conclusion, female knows female sufferings very well. The writer herself is a female. She may also face the problem of contemporary society in her writings. She is from Victorian Era; this period is highly influenced by male dominated society. In the novel male dominated the female can not get rights of education, health, marriage. Before deciding to to anything which is accordance with owns life someone one should take the suggestions from guardians. Women have to follow the rules, values and institutions that were established to favour men. Challenging all these values, institutions and even relationships is a tough job at that period. Patriarchal is the basic view that is it is male-centred and controlled is organized and conducted in such a way as to subordinate women to men in all cultural domains: familial, religious, political, economic, social, legal and artistic.